Crusaders of Crypto un juego retro 2D para ganar Tokens BNB

Crusaders of Crypto un juego retro 2D para ganar Tokens BNB

Crusaders of Crypto es un proyecto roguelike que fusiona el amor por el juego retro y la criptografía. Jugando se podrá ganar BNB a través del Token CRUSADER, participar en eventos (para obtener más BNB), e incluso incluso ganar NFTs, simplemente por tener CRUSADER y jugar al juego.

En el lanzamiento de Crusaders of Crypto, habrá eventos semanales de clasificación en los que los jugadores podrán compartir sus logros en la mazmorra. Se organizarán eventos en los que la redistribución de BNB de la cartera del juego recompensará al mejor jugador y a un jugador aleatorio con BNB (el valor total del premio se basa en el valor de redistribución de BNB de la cartera del juego).

Esto proporciona un incentivo para adentrarse en la mazmorra de Crusaders of Crypto, para presumir ante todos de que eres el más fuerte del país, ¡y para conseguir algo de cripto en el proceso!

Cómo jugar a Crusaders of Crypto

Abre el juego – Crusaders of Crytpo es un juego basado en navegador DAPP Simplemente entra aquí. Entra con tu wallet de MetaMask, o juega como invitado para probar el juego. Si quieres competir en las tablas de clasificación será necesario vincular la wallet. Pelea y saquea. Eso es todo. Adéntrate en las mazmorras generadas aleatoriamente hasta que te sientas satisfecho. Puedes reclamar el BNB visitando la sala de botín.

Varias forma de conseguir BNB

Una parte del impuesto de la tokens CRUSADER se reserva para la redistribución de BNB para todos los poseedores del token CRUSADER. Esta redistribución de BNB se acumula indefinidamente, sin plazos y se reserva para todos y cada uno de los titulares de forma individual. El juego no cuenta con una wallet directa desde la web para retirar el BNB. Para reclamar los tokens BNB será desde el propio juego en la Dungeon Loot Room personal. Con el tiempo, podremos personalizar el «calabozo» con NFTs y desafiar los calabozos de otros jugadores. El BNB concedido es tuyo, para siempre.

Cada transacción genera liquidez adicional que entra en los intercambios, proporcionando sostenibilidad al token.

PVPD (Jugador contra Mazmorras de jugador)

Con el fin de aumentar el aspecto social y competitivo del juego, se introducirá una nueva modalidad de juego: PVPD

El PVPD es una modalidad de pvp asíncrona en la que hay dos participantes, el retador y el gestor de la mazmorra. El administrador de la mazmorra personalizará su mazmorra para dictar

los siguientes aspectos en su mazmorra:

Tamaño de la mazmorra

Qué habitación puede aparecer

Qué monstruos pueden aparecer

Qué jefe puede aparecer

Qué efectos de entorno se utilizan

FTs/NFTs + PVPD

Para alimentar las opciones disponibles en el sistema pvpd (tanto para

desafiantes como para las mazmorras), los FTs/NFTs serán lo que impulse las opciones disponibles para el jugador. Por lo tanto, lo siguiente (pero no limitado a) estará disponible como FTs:

monstruos

tamaños de mazmorras

jefes

decoraciones/temas de las mazmorras

clases de personajes

azulejos de la sala de la mazmorra

armas

armadura

joyas

Nota: Un conjunto básico de lo anterior no se hará como FTs, y será una parte básica de la experiencia de juego/PVPD, para seguir apoyando la configuración de juego GRATIS.

Los NFTs cubrirán las mismas opciones que la selección de FT, pero difieren cosméticamente. Y fieles al tema de las NFT, estas opciones cosméticamente diferentes serán limitadas en número.

Economía del juego y el token RUPEE

El RUPEE es un Token personalizado que podrá ser reclamado por cualquier persona que tenga un CRUSADER. El RUPEE no se podrá comprar ni transferir (excepto para comprar el FT/NFT).

Los titulares de CRUSADER acumulan RUPEE a lo largo del tiempo, hasta una cantidad máxima en la wallet. El ritmo al que los titulares de CRUSADER ganan RUPEE se basa en el tamaño de la wallet de CRUSADER, hasta una cantidad máxima, y en la cantidad mínima.

En la mayoría de los casos, cuando salgan nuevos FT/NFT, no se podrán comprar con RUPEE, sino sólo con BNB. Cuando esto ocurra, los FT que antes sólo se podían comprar con BNB se podrán adquirir con RUPEE. Los NFTs estarán disponibles para su compra con RUPEE en función de cada caso.

El 50% de todas las compras a través de BNB se utilizará para comprar y quemar tokens de CRUSADER, lo que beneficiará al precio mínimo. El otro 50% se destinará al equipo para el desarrollo/eventos

Hoja de Ruta de Crusaders of Crypto

Crusaders of Crypto es relativamente nuevo y ya tenemos la base disponible la cual se irá ampliando a lo largo de este año 2021:

2º Trimestre de 2021

Base Cruzados de Criptojuego

Lanzamiento del token CRUSADER

Dapp de juego para la reclamación de BNB

Sitio web

Poocoin/reddit/twitter M arketing

Tabla de clasificación Comisiones

AMAs

Nuevos contenidos (artículos, monstruos, etc.)

Auditoría de WatchPug

3º Trimestre de 2021

Listado en CoinGecko

Listado en CoinMarketCap

PVPD (Mazmorras de jugador contra jugador)

NFTs adquiribles para beneficios en el juego (¡más adelante!)

NFTs gratuitos para beneficios en el juego para los titulares a través del sistema RUPEE

Comisiones de pago en la tabla de clasificación

Nuevos contenidos (objetos, monstruos, etc.)

4º Trimestre de 2021

PVPD Apuestas / Stake

Asociaciones de tokens para las comisiones de la tabla de clasificación

Mercado de NFT del juego para apoyar el comercio entre jugadores

Sistema de logros NFT

Nuevos contenidos (objetos, jefes, etc.)

Enlaces de Interés

Bitcoin Can Be The Change You’ve Been Waiting For

Bitcoin offers a way for us to stop just appearing like we want to fix things, instead making real change.

We live in a pretend world with pretend ideals, pretend money and pretend language. A world of quick fix and quick bucks, where the road to success no longer requires hard work, just papering over whatever defects emerge. If something doesn’t seem as perfect as the movies or your neighbor’s life, we medicate, we whitewash, we dress up in fancy garbs and decorated facades until we convince ourselves and everyone else that the inside isn’t corrupt and failing, but respectable and thriving.

Throw your deflating money against the cryptocurrency wall and maybe you’ll strike gold. Take your investment advice from a Tik-Tok video, buy GameStop options on a whim and pray for a miracle. When it fails, complain about the injustices of capitalism instead of locating the underlying issue: high time preference and the inability to take responsibility for life choices.

We rely on fake energy, with solar panels on the roof and wind turbines in the desert, the plains and the ocean banks, and then we’re surprised when blackouts hit and electricity bills go through the roof. The government and the environmental talking heads said they were clean and threw subsidies your way, so naturally they must be good.

If there’s a freak virus precipitously spreading across the world, we come down heavy with all the mighty force of Big Government, assisted, naturally, by the central planners of the world. We don’t let people take responsibility for their health — encouraging them to eat better, workout more, be outside more — but lock them in their homes where the disease spreads easier, and they don’t renew their vitamin D supplies. We pretend the solution is a medical invasion, a quick fix, rather than a healthy body and strong immune system.

We pretend we can fix problems if only we put the right central planner in charge to enforce a minor pain relief after the fact.

With A Mere Adjective We Can Change The World

In my professional life, I sometimes have the ungrateful task of dealing with writers who have thoroughly incorporated this view of the world. A few years ago The Guardian, Britain’s foremost left-wing newspaper, drew praise across the world when their editors updated the newspaper’s language use. Climate change would henceforth be referred to as the “climate emergency” or the “climate crisis;” climate sceptics as “climate science deniers” or the more terrifying “climate denier.”

Earlier this year I noticed that the Financial Times — of their own accord or through peer-pressure — has followed suit. In an article denouncing Bitcoin’s energy use (which, in reality, is quite minor), the editorial board felt the need to write, “There should not have to be a trade-off between the so-called democratisation of finance and the climate emergency,” as if the use of stronger words had any bearing on the subject matter of the piece. And it wasn’t the first time either, as the editorial board on at least two prior occasions last year (here and here) used that exact phrasing in opinion pieces. Just a few years ago, the FT routinely used more conventional language to discuss climate change.

For the life of me I couldn’t fathom what was the reason for this obsession with word games. Could it really be that what was preventing the world from embarking on the aggressive climate policies that the higher echelons of our intellectual class so desperately desire were the words used by these same reality-detached elitist journalists?

A similar thing happened with ethnicity last year. Simmering in the underworld of the race wars, plenty of activists had urged their news providers to capitalize “Black” so as to indicate that it was an ethnic group of unified heritage (like Latino or Native American), rather than merely a physical description, a mere adjective. It took until the George Floyd protests last summer for the New York Times to internalize this important battle of our times: respecting and honoring the historic sacrifice of African-Americans — by symbolically upgrading a letter. The Associated Press, setting standards for many other publications, issued similar guidelines and plunged straight into the culture wars by refusing to similarly capitalize “white.” “White people,” its announcement read, “have much less shared history and culture” and thus didn’t merit the upgrade.

I don’t mind varying writing styles. I make a living editing newsletters, quarterly reports and submissions to academic journals. Most outlets use a different style and format; some capitalize titles while others don’t. Some write out full names while others rely on initials. Some require a certain convention of letters and numbers (say, the numbers one through nine spelled out, but 10 and higher using digits). This is the way of decentralized and emerging orders like language. To each her own. During Black History Month last year, I even recommended a client follow this new activist spelling practice because her piece dealt precisely with the suppression of Black writers in media and education, and the spelling convention was a relevant touch.

Spelling conventions, gender-neutral pronouns or other shallow etiquettes aren’t really what bothers me — they are merely icing on the cake, the wrapping of a present. What irks me to no end is the sanctimonious elites who substitute real and meaningful change for phony charades. If you truly believe in the importance of your cause, you ought to do something about it instead of playing word games or dressing up your news in righteous facades. If people care about your writing, it’s because of the content of your work, not the spelling convention you opt for in packaging that message. That’s why British conventions in spelling (e.g. “labour,” “defence”) or punctuation, while unusual for an American audience, hardly distracts them from appreciating Churchill or Orwell.

Speaking of Orwell, our journalist corps seem to have embraced the opposite sin that Orwell attacked in his “Politics and the English Language”: instead of obscuring truths by using euphemisms, writers exaggerate truths to the point of mentally numbing their readers. If crisis is now our daily state of affairs, how are we to refer to actual crises once they emerge — doubleplus-crises? If rectifying inequalities can be done by a literal stroke of an editor’s pen, why don’t we already live in a paradise of fairness and plenty?

Do we really think that we cure deep-seated hatred toward another’s race, sex or sexuality by updating the spelling in articles that the objects of our derisive gospels are unlikely to read? Most likely, you simply annoy and polarize people before distancing yourself from the very people whose minds you most wish to persuade.

In “The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature,” Harvard’s Steven Pinker wrote about “euphemism treadmills,” the linguistic idea “that concepts, not words, are primary in people’s minds.” If you update the name of something, the neologism inherits the connotation of that thing. “Give a concept a new name, and the name becomes colored by the concept.”

In recent decades, a “cleaner” became a “janitor,” then a “custodian” or “caretaker” and then “facility manager” (and soon, I suppose, “material removal executive”). Yet, whatever status-lowering disdain that may or may not exist for people who clean the desks of our journalists-turned-semantic crusaders remains fairly intact (not that it should, as their value to society probably outstrips those whom the facility managers serve).

St. Thomas More, a 16th century statesman, author and lawyer, is often credited with saying:

“Some men say the earth is flat. Some men say the earth is round. But if it is flat, could Parliament make it round? And if it is round, could the King’s command flatten it?”

Replace “rulers” with “journalists” and “earth” with “the issues of our time,” and Sir Thomas could speak to our society five centuries later.

Instead of actually striving for greatness, self-actualization or a secure and comfortable living, we patch over our fake ideals with quick fixes. We portray a glorious life on Instagram and we drool jealously over our friends’ latest filtered picture from Aruba, Bali or some Greek island beach. We relax, dreamily, with a telenovela or some astonishingly addictive Netflix show — not with the treasure trove of human literature, human connection or a sunset.

Once the initial jolt of joy passes, we reach for the opioids that the doctor so willingly prescribed or the anti-depressants we think keep us from the abyss. If we suffer from hypertension or type 2 diabetes, we think we’re in helpless need of expensive medication — not a workout or the balanced blood sugar provided by cutting out grains and carbs or following the carnivore diet.

In our hassle for fake everything, we skip the hard work that might actually improve our lives — the proof of work for our money, the proof of workout for our health, the proof of relationships that is the reward from our continual attention to them.

There are plenty of things that bitcoin and its Cyber Hornets don’t fix — but at least it provides some semblance of honesty and refusal to accept bullshit. It pushes its users toward taking responsibility for their own lives and finances, toward lifting their gaze from the immediate pains to the future gains and toward meaningful changes rather than cosmetic updates.

Fight the semantic and stylistic and political and medical battles all you want, but don’t pretend that it moves your lofty ideals an inch closer to reality. Quick fixes don’t fix a world drowning in pretension.

This is a guest post by Joakim Book. Opinions expressed are entirely their own and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine.

Top Cryptocurrency News On August 3: Major Stories On Bitcoin, Ethereum And China

Trends

Govt to decide on IMC’s report on crypto, may present legislative proposal: MoS Finance

Replying to a question on cryptocurrency trading, Minister of State for Finance Pankaj Chaudhary said currently, all entities regulated by RBI have been advised to carry out customer due diligence process in line with regulations governing standards for know your customer (KYC), Anti Money Laundering, Combating of Financing of Terrorism (CFT) and obligations of regulated entities under Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The entities have also been advised to ensure compliance with relevant provisions under FEMA for overseas remittances. In Budget 2018-19, it was announced that the government doesn’t consider cryptocurrencies legal tender or coin and will take all measures to eliminate use of these crypto assets in financing illegitimate activities or as part of the payments system. A high-level Inter-Ministerial Committee (IMC) constituted to study the issues related to virtual currencies and propose specific actions to be taken in the matter, recommended in its report that all private cryptocurrencies, except any cryptocurrency issued by the State, be prohibited in India. “The government would take a decision on the recommendations of the IMC and the legislative proposal, if any, would be introduced in Parliament following the due process,” Chaudhary said. Read more here.